Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:15

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
We Finally Know The Route Of Neanderthals’ Massive Migration Across Eurasia - IFLScience
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Massive Achievement for Ripple as XRP Price Finally Awakens - CryptoPotato
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Switzerland proposes forcing UBS to add $26bn in capital - Financial Times
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Israel says it struck Tehran's Evin prison and Fordo access routes - BBC
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Can you wash a dog with washing liquid used for humans?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
When Kundalini is awakened accidentally, what can be done?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Trump’s tax bill could raise taxes on foreign companies, hurting investment from abroad - AP News